Artificial CT images can enhance variation of case images in diagnostic radiology skills training

Abstract

Objectives We sought to investigate if artificial medical images can blend with original ones and whether they adhere to the variable anatomical constraints provided. Methods Artificial images were generated with a generative model trained on publicly available standard and low-dose chest CT images (805 scans; 39,803 2D images), of which 17% contained evidence of pathological formations (lung nodules). The test set (90 scans; 5121 2D images) was used to assess if artificial images (512 × 512 primary and control image sets) blended in with original images, using both quantitative metrics and expert opinion. We further assessed if pathology characteristics in the artificial images can be manipulated. Results Primary and control artificial images attained an average objective similarity of 0.78 ± 0.04 (ranging from 0 [entirely dissimilar] to 1[identical]) and 0.76 ± 0.06, respectively. Five radiologists with experience in chest and thoracic imaging provided a subjective measure of image quality; they rated artificial images as 3.13 ± 0.46 (range of 1 [unrealistic] to 4 [almost indistinguishable to the original image]), close to their rating of the original images (3.73 ± 0.31). Radiologists clearly distinguished images in the control sets (2.32 ± 0.48 and 1.07 ± 0.19). In almost a quarter of the scenarios, they were not able to distinguish primary artificial images from the original ones. Conclusion Artificial images can be generated in a way such that they blend in with original images and adhere to anatomical constraints, which can be manipulated to augment the variability of cases.